Showing posts with label gangsters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gangsters. Show all posts

Friday, February 8, 2008

Case Study 1: Gary Nelson

I watched the January episode of CrimeWatch, which showed an on-going case on a South London gangster who they've finally convicted for his crime that he commited 12 years ago.

The man in question is Gary Nelson, 36, one of Britain's most dangerous gangsters, was found guilty of the murders of security guard William "Kwame" Danso and PC Patrick Dunne in Cato Road, Clapham, south London, in October 1993.

I used the websites http://www.guardian.co.uk/gun/Story/0,,1712558,00.html, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/18/ngangsta18.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/02/18/ixportal.html and http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4717168.stm which have furthered my knowledge on this case even more. I want to use this as one of my main case studies - going into detail why he murdered his 2 victims, what his lifestyle was like, what his influences were (films? peer pressures? etc), which in turn will hopefully prove useful in arguing my view.


On reading up about Gary Nelson, it has becomme apparent that his violent record, consisting of 21 offences, dates back to his teen years (15), with links to one of Londons most infamous crime families. He may have joined this group due to peer pressure, or as a result of wanting to feel 'invinsible' (which is how he later described himself).

We can also see a side of Nelson's personality which may suggest he had some mental problems - in 1994, he ran out of his cell naked lunging at police officers with a broom handle. In addition, he was convicted of commiting a violent act on a man who simply overtook his car whilst driving. This could suggest an instability in his thought processes, meaning that he felt the need to release his anger through violent acts.

Initial Proposal No.1

1. Which topic area is this proposal for?
Crime and the Media.

2. What is the suggested focus?
Focusing on the controversal question: 'Is The The Media To Blame' - the media isn't to blame for the increasing rate of violent crme.

3. Do you have an idea for a question/problematic?
'The Media Is Not To Blame'....the general argument of the essay will be arguing that crime films/British gangster films do not effect people who commit crimes - they are not influenced by them; instead there are other key factors that cause criminals to do wrong in society.

4. Why would you choose this?
Because I'm really interested in crime and what goes on in and around society. I enjoy watching programs such as CrimeWatch UK as I find all the different cases really intriguing. I love hearing about crime stories and have a lot of knowledge on the topic already, which will help me with this project.

5. Do you have any concerns or are there any limitations to this proposal?
I have to consider both sides of the question: I must outline the arguments which state that the media is to blame for the increasing rate of crime, and state why I feel they are not the core reasons for why people commit crime.

6. Can you rate it on a sliding scale 1- 5 (5 being great proposal, 0 being lousy proposal)
31/2 - I think this proposal is a good one, however I need to ensure that I get the right information, both theory and evidence in order to successfully answer my question.